<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Help desk contenders: First Looks &#8211; commercial contenders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:09:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BackupBrain: My MicroISV Venture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FogBugz vs HelpSpot&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>BackupBrain: My MicroISV Venture &#187; Blog Archive &#187; FogBugz vs HelpSpot&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] I wanted to link to it from here as it nicely follows my previous comparison of help desk software. He also brings up a point worth thinking about early on regarding keeping your help desk and bug tracking software separate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wanted to link to it from here as it nicely follows my previous comparison of help desk software. He also brings up a point worth thinking about early on regarding keeping your help desk and bug tracking software separate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, except for the &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.splashpool.org/casefile.php?casefileid=af91c5140e04800ca10f75ed89af0b26&quot;&gt;Helpdesk casefile&lt;/a&gt; on SplashPool, there aren&#039;t many comparisons around of help desk software. It may not be the most comprehensive round-up, but both entries are my most visited posts, so hopefully they are useful starting point to other people.

I&#039;ll have to check out your post as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, except for the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.splashpool.org/casefile.php?casefileid=af91c5140e04800ca10f75ed89af0b26">Helpdesk casefile</a> on SplashPool, there aren&#8217;t many comparisons around of help desk software. It may not be the most comprehensive round-up, but both entries are my most visited posts, so hopefully they are useful starting point to other people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to check out your post as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 03:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Hey, not sure how I missed this one. Nice research. It&#039;s great to see you laying it out like this. I know many of my customers went through this exact process, but since nobody posts it up anywhere all that effort isn&#039;t turned into something productive for others.

I just posted a little diddy about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.userscape.com/blog/2006/03/14/fogbugz-vs-helpspot-as-a-help-desk/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FogBugz and HelpSpot&lt;/a&gt; which you might find interesting as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, not sure how I missed this one. Nice research. It&#8217;s great to see you laying it out like this. I know many of my customers went through this exact process, but since nobody posts it up anywhere all that effort isn&#8217;t turned into something productive for others.</p>
<p>I just posted a little diddy about <a href="http://www.userscape.com/blog/2006/03/14/fogbugz-vs-helpspot-as-a-help-desk/" rel="nofollow">FogBugz and HelpSpot</a> which you might find interesting as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 03:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Yes. This is one area where the commercial products seem to be quite far ahead of their open source counterparts. Some of the O/S solutions are really quite powerful and may be good for internal bug-tracking and/or project management for larger teams, but for any use that is &quot;customer-facing&quot; the commericial products are just, well, better.

The old adage, &quot;You&#039;ve got to spend money to make money&quot;, applies here!

Thanks for the FogBugz clarification - it wasn&#039;t too clear on the website how far the e-mail aspects went. It will be interesting to see what they add to FogBugz 5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. This is one area where the commercial products seem to be quite far ahead of their open source counterparts. Some of the O/S solutions are really quite powerful and may be good for internal bug-tracking and/or project management for larger teams, but for any use that is &#8220;customer-facing&#8221; the commericial products are just, well, better.</p>
<p>The old adage, &#8220;You&#8217;ve got to spend money to make money&#8221;, applies here!</p>
<p>Thanks for the FogBugz clarification &#8211; it wasn&#8217;t too clear on the website how far the e-mail aspects went. It will be interesting to see what they add to FogBugz 5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian M. Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian M. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 22:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>So, it looks to me that you&#039;re leaning towards commercial products already, because of their tighter, better thought out feature set and support. Do you think you&#039;re more likely to go for commercial?

Oh, by the way, FogBugz has a multiple mailbox feature too, you can grab emails from different mailboxes and have then go to different projects, with specific area, release, priority etc. FogBugz&#039;s SPAM filtering is heaven sent too, works pretty well at filtering out the SPAM and can also sort emails into different areas based on their content once it&#039;s trained. It&#039;s email handling is very powerful.

Looking forward to seeing how you get on with these tools, it&#039;s nice to see someone doing a proper independent comparison and test of them.

I should declare that I have an interest in FogBugz doing well as I make a reporting tool called CaseDetective for FogBugz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it looks to me that you&#8217;re leaning towards commercial products already, because of their tighter, better thought out feature set and support. Do you think you&#8217;re more likely to go for commercial?</p>
<p>Oh, by the way, FogBugz has a multiple mailbox feature too, you can grab emails from different mailboxes and have then go to different projects, with specific area, release, priority etc. FogBugz&#8217;s SPAM filtering is heaven sent too, works pretty well at filtering out the SPAM and can also sort emails into different areas based on their content once it&#8217;s trained. It&#8217;s email handling is very powerful.</p>
<p>Looking forward to seeing how you get on with these tools, it&#8217;s nice to see someone doing a proper independent comparison and test of them.</p>
<p>I should declare that I have an interest in FogBugz doing well as I make a reporting tool called CaseDetective for FogBugz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glenn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reminder about OnTime, Gavin. It&#039;s downloading now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reminder about OnTime, Gavin. It&#8217;s downloading now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Bowman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Bowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.backupbrain.com.au/glenn/2006/02/24/help-desk-contenders-first-looks-commercial-contenders/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Glenn, while they are running this offer, you might want to take a look at Ontime&#039;s bug tracker... they do have a link on their front page about using it as a helpdesk. I think today is the last day they are selling it for $5... at that price it&#039;s worth picking up a copy just in case.

http://www.axosoft.com/Products/ontime.aspx?cn=otm_stepromo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, while they are running this offer, you might want to take a look at Ontime&#8217;s bug tracker&#8230; they do have a link on their front page about using it as a helpdesk. I think today is the last day they are selling it for $5&#8230; at that price it&#8217;s worth picking up a copy just in case.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.axosoft.com/Products/ontime.aspx?cn=otm_stepromo" rel="nofollow">http://www.axosoft.com/Products/ontime.aspx?cn=otm_stepromo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
